Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ENTA · against 364 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #315 of 365 · scores higher than 14% of peers · safety percentile 13
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)30 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including ENTA · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity and beta, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | ENTA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 334 reported | 1.80× | 0.19× | 7% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 349 reported | 0.96 | 0.47 | 23% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 359 reported | 3.76× | 3.08× | 57% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 186M USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 2 | 421M USD | 99 | 52 | |
| 3 | 165M USD | 99 | 50 | |
| 4 | 261M USD | 99 | 97 | |
| 5 | 397M USD | 99 | 37 | |
| 311 | 468M EUR (≈$514M) | 15 | 57 | |
| 312 | 1.8B BRL (≈$328M) | 15 | 65 | |
| 313 | 19.8B INR (≈$238M) | 14 | 37 | |
| 314 | 3.6B CNY (≈$507M) | 13 | 29 | |
| 315 | 302M USD | 13 | 17 | |
| 316 | 1.8B HKD (≈$224M) | 13 | 59 | |
| 317 | 1.0B MYR (≈$229M) | 12 | 44 | |
| 318 | 201M USD | 12 | 24 | |
| 319 | 472M USD | 12 | 33 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score