Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
EMN · against 200 other Basic Materials companies of similar size
Ranked #166 of 201 · scores higher than 18% of peers · safety percentile 18
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)25 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including EMN · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity and beta, which are weaker than most Basic Materials peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | EMN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 201 reported | 0.86× | 0.30× | 17% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 198 reported | 1.08 | 0.78 | 29% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 185 reported | 1.57× | 1.83× | 39% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 69.8B MXN (≈$3.8B) | 99 | 61 | |
| 2 | 708.7B JPY (≈$4.8B) | 98 | 49 | |
| 3 | 54.2B SAR (≈$14.6B) | 97 | 77 | |
| 4 | 12.0B AUD (≈$8.0B) | 97 | 74 | |
| 5 | 5.3B USD | 97 | 91 | |
| 162 | 91.4B CNY (≈$12.8B) | 19 | 31 | |
| 163 | 9.1B USD | 19 | 73 | |
| 164 | 4.0B USD | 18 | 46 | |
| 165 | 37.2B CNY (≈$5.2B) | 18 | 50 | |
| 166 | 7.5B USD | 18 | 42 | |
| 167 | 6.2B USD | 17 | 61 | |
| 168 | 72.5B HKD (≈$9.3B) | 16 | 70 | |
| 169 | 64.2B CNY (≈$9.0B) | 16 | 58 | |
| 170 | 32.6B CNY (≈$4.6B) | 16 | 51 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score