Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
EMBJ · against 266 other Industrials companies of similar size
Ranked #119 of 267 · scores higher than 56% of peers · safety percentile 41
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)35 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including EMBJ · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | EMBJ | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 261 reported | 0.69× | 0.56× | 42% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 257 reported | 0.69 | 0.86 | 64% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 259 reported | 1.44× | 1.54× | 45% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 22.4B USD | 99 | 62 | |
| 2 | 1.36T JPY (≈$9.2B) | 96 | 70 | |
| 3 | 3.91T JPY (≈$26.6B) | 95 | 70 | |
| 4 | 1.06T JPY (≈$7.2B) | 94 | 76 | |
| 5 | 1.44T JPY (≈$9.8B) | 94 | 73 | |
| 115 | 21.7B SGD (≈$16.5B) | 42 | 55 | |
| 116 | 19.6B USD | 42 | 61 | |
| 117 | 236.0B TWD (≈$7.3B) | 42 | 67 | |
| 118 | 17.3B USD | 41 | 56 | |
| 119 | 13.4B USD | 41 | 62 | |
| 120 | 26.6B USD | 41 | 55 | |
| 121 | 8.5B USD | 41 | 66 | |
| 122 | 10.2B USD | 41 | 55 | |
| 123 | 102.1B SEK (≈$10.2B) | 41 | 53 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score