Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
EMBC · against 396 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #375 of 397 · scores higher than 6% of peers · safety percentile 6
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)41 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including EMBC · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity, beta and current ratio, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | EMBC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 364 reported | Not reported | 0.19× | — | — | 33% |
| BetaLower is better · 381 reported | 0.83 | 0.45 | 28% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 389 reported | 1.68× | 3.03× | 28% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 186M USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 2 | 421M USD | 99 | 52 | |
| 3 | 261M USD | 99 | 97 | |
| 4 | 397M USD | 99 | 37 | |
| 5 | 455M USD | 99 | 53 | |
| 371 | 251M EUR (≈$276M) | 7 | 52 | |
| 372 | 2.9B CNY (≈$412M) | 7 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 22 |
| 373 | 334M USD | 7 | 53 |
| 374 | 3.4B SEK (≈$337M) | 6 | 45 |
| 375 | 344M USD | 6 | 54 |
| 376 | 453M USD | 6 | 6 |
| 377 | 296M USD | 5 | 66 |
| 378 | 222M GBP (≈$288M) | 5 | 13 |
| 379 | 3.7B CNY (≈$520M) | 5 | 42 |