Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Embecta Corp.
How Embecta Corp. stacks up
EMBC · against 383 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Profitability
90/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #21 of 384 · scores higher than 94% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score24 peers with a profitability score of 90–100, including EMBC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 90?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly thanks to its return on invested capital, operating margin and return on assets, which are stronger than most Healthcare peers.
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 81% of peers. Return on assets: 6.9% vs peer median 1.7%
- a wider operating margin: stronger than 84% of peers. Operating margin: 21.9% vs peer median 7.1%
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 92% of peers. Return on invested capital: 28.1% vs peer median 4.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = EMBC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | EMBC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 351 reported | 28.1% | 0.4% | 94% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 355 reported | 21.9% | 3.2% | 90% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 382 reported | 6.9% | -0.2% | 90% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 361 reported | Not reported | -0.8% | — | — | Context only |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 402 reported | 58.4% | 37.1% | 70% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around EMBC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 595M USD | 99 | 97 | |
| 1 | 433M USD | 99 | 81 | |
| 1 | 578M USD | 99 | 73 | |
| 1 | 609M USD | 99 | 91 | |
| 5 | 4.4B CNY (≈$611M) | 98 | 77 | |
| 17 | 4.6B SEK (≈$456M) | 91 | 64 | |
| 17 | 298M CHF (≈$342M) | 91 | 74 | |
| 21 | 3.7B HKD (≈$471M) | 90 | 69 | |
| 21 | 2.7B CNY (≈$377M) | 90 | 77 | |
| 21 | 344M USD | 90 | 54 | |
| 21 | 528M USD | 90 | 58 | |
| 25 | 4.7B HKD (≈$606M) | 89 | 75 | |
| 25 | 8.1B TWD (≈$251M) | 89 | 69 | |
| 25 | 3.6B CNY (≈$506M) | 89 | 65 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score