Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Evolution Metals & Technologies Corp.
How Evolution Metals & Technologies Corp. stacks up
EMAT · against 524 other Basic Materials companies of similar size
Profitability
2/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #512 of 525 · scores higher than 1% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score36 peers with a profitability score of 0–9, including EMAT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 2?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly because of its return on assets and return on invested capital, which are weaker than most Basic Materials peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 100% of peers. Return on assets: -415.6% vs peer median 2.5%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 100% of peers. Return on invested capital: -595.1% vs peer median 6.7%
- Operating margin is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = EMAT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | EMAT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 499 reported | -595.1% | 6.2% | 0% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 514 reported | Not reported | 6.6% | — | — | 33% |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 499 reported | -415.6% | 2.2% | 0% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 496 reported | Not reported | 4.8% | — | — | Context only |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 540 reported | 9.4% | 19.3% | 22% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around EMAT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 436M GBP (≈$566M) | 98 | 76 | |
| 1 | 934M AUD (≈$617M) | 98 | 85 | |
| 1 | 2.0B USD | 98 | 89 | |
| 1 | 2.0B AUD (≈$1.3B) | 98 | 74 | |
| 1 | 1.0B AUD (≈$673M) | 98 | 80 | |
| 512 | 4.4B CNY (≈$617M) | 2 | 6 | |
| 512 | 1.1B USD | 2 | 35 | |
| 512 | 926M USD | 2 | 8 | |
| 512 | 696M USD | 2 | 35 | |
| 512 | 1.0B USD | 2 | ||
| 512 | 1.5B USD | 2 | 34 | |
| 512 | 663M EUR (≈$729M) | 2 | 22 | |
| 512 | 2.0B USD | 2 | 36 | |
| 521 | 4.4B CNY (≈$613M) | 0 | 34 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score