Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.
How Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc. stacks up
ELS · against 82 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Growth
46/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #64 of 83 · scores higher than 23% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score9 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including ELS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 46?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Its metrics sit close to the Real Estate norm.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 2.3% vs peer median 3.8%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 7.6% vs peer median 11.2%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 2.5% vs peer median 3.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ELS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ELS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 84 reported | 2.5% | 5.4% | 33% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 66 reported | 7.6% | 14.7% | 35% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 82 reported | 2.3% | 6.5% | 17% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ELS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.1B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 2 | 7.60T CLP (≈$8.4B) | 99 | 86 | |
| 3 | 11.7B USD | 98 | 49 | |
| 3 | 13.7B USD | 98 | 70 | |
| 5 | 7.2B USD | 97 | 34 | |
| 58 | 14.8B USD | 50 | 51 | |
| 61 | 2.85T JPY (≈$19.4B) | 49 | 67 | |
| 61 | 10.8B CAD (≈$7.9B) | 49 | 40 | |
| 63 | 9.1B USD | 48 | 38 | |
| 64 | 12.1B USD | 46 | 43 | |
| 65 | 11.2B SGD (≈$8.5B) | 45 | 52 | |
| 66 | 18.1B SGD (≈$13.8B) | 43 | 55 | |
| 66 | 10.0B USD | 43 | 45 | |
| 68 | 5.0B GBP (≈$6.5B) | 42 | 40 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score