Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Companhia Paranaense de Energia
How Companhia Paranaense de Energia stacks up
ELPC · against 85 other Utilities companies of similar size
Valuation
60/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #36 of 86 · scores higher than 59% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score6 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including ELPC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 60?
Weighted metrics compared with all Utilities companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield, earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are stronger than most Utilities peers.
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 68% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 4.6% vs peer median 0.0%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 70% of peers. Earnings yield: 3.5% vs peer median 4.8%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 72% of peers. EBITDA yield: 11.4% vs peer median 8.6%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ELPC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ELPC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 85 reported | 8.0% | 5.5% | 68% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 86 reported | 11.4% | 8.6% | 72% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 39 reported | 4.6% | -2.9% | 74% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 79 reported | Not reported | 56.2% | — | — | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ELPC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 55.0B HKD (≈$7.0B) | 99 | 63 | |
| 1 | 8.54T CLP (≈$9.4B) | 99 | 67 | |
| 3 | 6.9B GBP (≈$9.0B) | 98 | 73 | |
| 4 | 45.8B HKD (≈$5.9B) | 94 | 61 | |
| 4 | 4.84T CLP (≈$5.3B) | 94 | 72 | |
| 32 | 13.8B EUR (≈$15.2B) | 68 | 64 | |
| 33 | 4.6B USD | 66 | 59 | |
| 33 | 9.1B EUR (≈$10.0B) | 66 | 61 | |
| 35 | 44.2B CNY (≈$6.2B) | 63 | 51 | |
| 36 | 7.6B USD | 60 | 46 | |
| 37 | 5.3B USD | 59 | 44 | |
| 38 | 72.1B CNY (≈$10.1B) | 57 | 42 | |
| 39 | 5.2B USD | 56 | 55 | |
| 40 | 40.4B BRL (≈$7.3B) | 55 | 70 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score