Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ELA · against 457 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #2 of 458 · scores higher than 99% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score35 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including ELA · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its revenue growth, earnings per share growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
| Metric | ELA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 462 reported | 47.7% | 1.7% | 97% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 265 reported | 162.2% | 0.0% | 96% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 457 reported | 14.8% | 2.0% | 86% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.3B MYR (≈$277M) | 100 | 60 | |
| 2 | 732.9B KRW (≈$528M) | 99 | 61 | |
| 2 | 3.4B CNY (≈$470M) | 99 | 61 | |
| 2 | 293M USD | 99 | 89 | |
| 2 | 1.5B BRL (≈$267M) | 99 | 92 | |
| 6 | 3.1B CNY (≈$437M) | 98 | 38 | |
| 6 | 2.9B CNY (≈$405M) | 98 | 50 | |
| 6 | 3.3B CNY (≈$463M) | 98 | 53 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score