Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Encompass Health Corporation
How Encompass Health Corporation stacks up
EHC · against 133 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Growth
58/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #66 of 134 · scores higher than 50% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score24 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including EHC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 58?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Its metrics sit close to the Healthcare norm.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 9.5% vs peer median 6.1%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 63% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 21.3% vs peer median 9.8%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 64% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 10.7% vs peer median 5.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = EHC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | EHC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 135 reported | 9.5% | 9.5% | 50% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 99 reported | 21.3% | 18.3% | 52% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 129 reported | 10.7% | 10.7% | 50% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around EHC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.8B USD | 99 | 31 | |
| 2 | 9.3B USD | 98 | 64 | |
| 3 | 14.87T KRW (≈$10.7B) | 97 | 76 | |
| 3 | 21.4B USD | 97 | 67 | |
| 3 | 7.3B USD | 97 | 74 | |
| 62 | 10.4B USD | 60 | 64 | |
| 63 | 66.0B BRL (≈$11.9B) | 59 | 55 | |
| 63 | 69.1B BRL (≈$12.4B) | 59 | 57 | |
| 63 | 12.6B USD | 59 | 55 | |
| 66 | 13.3B USD | 58 | 59 | |
| 66 | 10.9B EUR (≈$11.9B) | 58 | 59 | |
| 66 | 101.7B BRL (≈$18.3B) | 58 | 58 | |
| 69 | 3.53T JPY (≈$24.0B) | 57 | 68 | |
| 69 | 7.2B USD | 57 | 43 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score