Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
EGHT · against 435 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #430 of 436 · scores higher than 1% of peers · safety percentile 1
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)35 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including EGHT · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity, beta and current ratio, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | EGHT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 413 reported | 2.42× | 0.23× | 3% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 419 reported | 1.85 | 0.68 | 5% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 438 reported | 1.05× | 1.94× | 12% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 52.4B JPY (≈$356M) | 100 | 67 | |
| 2 | 2.6B CNY (≈$364M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 3 | 213M USD | 100 | 37 | |
| 4 | 308M USD | 99 | 62 | |
| 5 | 2.4B CNY (≈$338M) | 99 | 52 | |
| 426 | 510M EUR (≈$561M) | 2 | 37 | |
| 427 | 617.8B KRW (≈$445M) | 2 | 46 | |
| 428 | 3.3B CNY (≈$466M) | 2 | 17 | |
| 429 | 172M USD | 2 | 33 | |
| 430 | 302M USD | 1 | 47 | |
| 431 | 216M EUR (≈$238M) | 1 | 16 | |
| 432 | 3.3B CNY (≈$460M) | 1 | 1 | |
| 433 | 199M USD | 1 | 5 | |
| 434 | 170M USD | 0 | 5 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score