Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to 8x8, Inc.
How 8x8, Inc. stacks up
EGHT · against 440 other Technology companies of similar size
Profitability
34/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #228 of 441 · scores higher than 48% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score60 peers with a profitability score of 30–39, including EGHT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 34?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly because of its return on assets and operating margin, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 67% of peers. Return on assets: 0.7% vs peer median 2.9%
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 65% of peers. Operating margin: 3.1% vs peer median 6.3%
- Return on invested capital is close to the peer norm. Return on invested capital: 4.9% vs peer median 6.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = EGHT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | EGHT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 403 reported | 4.9% | 2.8% | 61% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 436 reported | 3.1% | 3.4% | 48% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 432 reported | 0.7% | 1.2% | 46% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 422 reported | 3.5% | 3.4% | 50% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 441 reported | 63.3% | 28.6% | 89% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around EGHT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 604M AUD (≈$399M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 2 | 50.3B JPY (≈$342M) | 99 | 84 | |
| 2 | 1.1B MYR (≈$240M) | 99 | 75 | |
| 4 | 56.5B JPY (≈$384M) | 98 | 80 | |
| 4 | 60.1B JPY (≈$409M) | 98 | 72 | |
| 228 | 3.1B CNY (≈$438M) | 34 | 42 | |
| 228 | 5.4B TWD (≈$168M) | 34 | 26 | |
| 228 | 6.7B TWD (≈$207M) | 34 | 47 | |
| 228 | 1.7B CNY (≈$245M) | 34 | 51 | |
| 228 | 302M USD | 34 | 47 | |
| 233 | 17.8B TWD (≈$553M) | 33 | 52 | |
| 233 | 4.0B CNY (≈$560M) | 33 | 23 | |
| 233 | 4.2B CNY (≈$590M) | 33 | 57 | |
| 233 | 2.1B SEK (≈$213M) | 33 | 49 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score