Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
EG · against 166 other Banks & Insurance companies of similar size
Ranked #41 of 167 · scores higher than 73% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score24 peers with a profitability score of 80–89, including EG · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its return on assets and return on equity, which are stronger than most Banks & Insurance peers.
| Metric | EG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 137 reported | 7.9% | 10.8% | 32% | Context only | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 19 reported | Not reported | 14.5% | — | — | Context only |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 167 reported | 3.1% | 1.3% | 81% | 50% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 165 reported | 12.8% | 12.8% | 50% | 50% | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 172 reported | 15.7% | 0.0% | 61% | Context only |
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 79.2B BRL (≈$14.3B) | 98 | 61 | |
| 1 | 536.3B ZAR (≈$29.5B) | 98 | 54 | |
| 1 | 24.3B AUD (≈$16.0B) | 98 | 45 | |
| 1 | 11.4B USD | 98 | 66 | |
| 1 | 8.7B USD | 98 | 61 | |
| 40 | 23.5B USD | 81 | 60 | |
| 41 | 20.98T KRW (≈$15.1B) | 80 | ||
| 41 | 323.7B TRY (≈$9.7B) | 80 | 81 | |
| 41 | 15.3B EUR (≈$16.9B) | 80 | 38 | |
| 41 | 15.2B USD | 80 | 85 | |
| 41 | 293.1B TRY (≈$8.8B) | 80 | 85 | |
| 46 | 19.1B USD | 79 | 28 | |
| 46 | 797.1B INR (≈$9.6B) | 79 | 42 | |
| 46 | 131.49T IDR (≈$8.2B) | 79 | 59 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score