Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
EFSC · against 260 other Banks & Insurance companies of similar size
Ranked #105 of 261 · scores higher than 59% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score31 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including EFSC · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Banks & Insurance norm.
| Metric | EFSC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 265 reported | 7.9% | 7.8% | 52% | 60% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 54 reported | Not reported | 9.9% | — | — | Context only |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 144 reported | Not reported | 8.6% | — | — | Context only |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 261 reported | 82.0% | 82.6% | 50% | 40% |
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.2B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 98 | ||
| 1 | 21.3B CNY (≈$3.0B) | 98 | 50 | |
| 1 | 13.7B HKD (≈$1.8B) | 98 | ||
| 1 | 12.7B HKD (≈$1.6B) | 98 | 56 | |
| 1 | 1.1B GBP (≈$1.5B) | 98 | 37 | |
| 102 | 288.8B JPY (≈$2.0B) | 61 | 52 | |
| 102 | 2.2B USD | 61 | 63 | |
| 102 | 2.3B CHF (≈$2.6B) | 61 | 36 | |
| 105 | 116.6B TWD (≈$3.6B) | 60 | 49 | |
| 105 | 2.2B USD | 60 | 40 | |
| 105 | 2.6B USD | 60 | 52 | |
| 108 | 1.0B GBP (≈$1.3B) | 59 | 43 | |
| 108 | 11.5B SEK (≈$1.1B) | 59 | 59 | |
| 110 | 602.6B JPY (≈$4.1B) | 58 | 53 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score