Ranked #139 of 256 · scores higher than 45% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score
21 peers with a profitability score of 40–49, including EFSC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 40?
Weighted metrics compared with all Banks & Insurance companies.
Its metrics sit close to the Banks & Insurance norm.
▼a lower return on shareholders' equity: weaker than 61% of peers. Return on equity: 9.3% vs peer median 10.7%
●Return on assets is close to the peer norm. Return on assets: 1.1% vs peer median 1.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = EFSC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
EFSC
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 233 reported
9.4%
10.2%
43%
Context only
Operating marginHigher is better · 39 reported
Not reported
26.9%
—
—
Context only
Return on assetsHigher is better · 257 reported
1.1%
1.2%
46%
50%
Return on equityHigher is better · 255 reported
9.6%
9.9%
47%
50%
Gross marginHigher is better · 270 reported
0.0%
0.0%
0%
Context only
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
