Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Everforth, Inc.
How Everforth, Inc. stacks up
EFOR · against 530 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
91/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #45 of 531 · scores higher than 91% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score56 peers with a valuation score of 90–100, including EFOR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 91?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield, EBITDA yield and earnings yield, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 74% of peers. Earnings yield: 4.8% vs peer median 2.2%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 87% of peers. EBITDA yield: 12.3% vs peer median 4.2%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 95% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 15.7% vs peer median 2.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = EFOR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | EFOR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 524 reported | 4.8% | 2.2% | 75% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 537 reported | 12.3% | 4.5% | 88% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 188 reported | 15.7% | 3.6% | 94% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 528 reported | 131.0% | 34.2% | 95% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around EFOR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.1B USD | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 1.7B USD | 100 | 67 | |
| 1 | 763M USD | 100 | 65 | |
| 4 | 16.7B HKD (≈$2.1B) | 98 | 80 | |
| 4 | 69.0B TWD (≈$2.1B) | 98 | 65 | |
| 45 | 6.0B HKD (≈$767M) | 91 | 45 | |
| 45 | 69.9B TWD (≈$2.2B) | 91 | 55 | |
| 45 | 350.6B JPY (≈$2.4B) | 91 | 40 | |
| 45 | 208.8B JPY (≈$1.4B) | 91 | 80 | |
| 45 | 1.4B USD | 91 | 50 | |
| 50 | 163.9B JPY (≈$1.1B) | 90 | 64 | |
| 50 | 26.3B TWD (≈$814M) | 90 | 50 | |
| 50 | 34.6B TWD (≈$1.1B) | 90 | 69 | |
| 50 | 12.1B HKD (≈$1.5B) | 90 | 39 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score