Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Euronet Worldwide, Inc.
How Euronet Worldwide, Inc. stacks up
EEFT · against 439 other Technology companies of similar size
Growth
48/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #246 of 440 · scores higher than 43% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score45 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including EEFT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 48?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 6.0% vs peer median 11.1%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 6.4% vs peer median 8.5%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 61% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 8.1% vs peer median 4.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = EEFT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | EEFT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 444 reported | 6.4% | 10.2% | 40% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 292 reported | 6.0% | 8.1% | 47% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 440 reported | 8.1% | 5.6% | 58% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around EEFT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.0B USD | 100 | 84 | |
| 1 | 1.4B USD | 100 | 72 | |
| 3 | 9.3B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 99 | 55 | |
| 3 | 267.8B JPY (≈$1.8B) | 99 | 67 | |
| 3 | 21.5B CNY (≈$3.0B) | 99 | 66 | |
| 246 | 11.2B CNY (≈$1.6B) | 48 | 59 | |
| 246 | 22.0B CNY (≈$3.1B) | 48 | 47 | |
| 246 | 10.0B CNY (≈$1.4B) | 48 | 35 | |
| 246 | 1.3B USD | 48 | 40 | |
| 246 | 2.5B USD | 48 | 58 | |
| 246 | 1.7B USD | 48 | 78 | |
| 252 | 13.6B CNY (≈$1.9B) | 47 | 42 | |
| 252 | 9.9B CNY (≈$1.4B) | 47 | 63 | |
| 252 | 92.4B TWD (≈$2.9B) | 47 | 52 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score