Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Euronet Worldwide, Inc.
How Euronet Worldwide, Inc. stacks up
EEFT · against 478 other Technology companies listed in US-listed
Growth
48/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #325 of 479 · scores higher than 31% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score39 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including EEFT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 48?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 6.0% vs peer median 11.1%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 6.4% vs peer median 8.5%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 61% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 8.1% vs peer median 4.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = EEFT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | EEFT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 496 reported | 6.4% | 13.1% | 28% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 286 reported | 6.0% | 22.4% | 34% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 471 reported | 8.1% | 9.7% | 46% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around EEFT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 40.5B USD | 100 | 75 | |
| 1 | 28.4B USD | 100 | 79 | |
| 1 | 4.0B USD | 100 | 84 | |
| 1 | 965.7B USD | 100 | 84 | |
| 1 | 1.4B USD | 100 | 72 | |
| 323 | 5.7B USD | 49 | 60 | |
| 323 | 6.5B USD | 49 | 48 | |
| 325 | 117.3B USD | 48 | 56 | |
| 325 | 1.3B USD | 48 | 40 | |
| 325 | 2.5B USD | 48 | 58 | |
| 325 | 6.7B USD | 48 | 68 | |
| 325 | 1.0B USD | 48 | 75 | |
| 325 | 14.9B USD | 48 | 53 | |
| 325 | 1.7B USD | 48 | 78 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score