Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to ECARX Holdings Inc.
How ECARX Holdings Inc. stacks up
ECX · against 519 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Profitability
5/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #481 of 520 · scores higher than 6% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score62 peers with a profitability score of 0–9, including ECX · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 5?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its return on assets, operating margin and return on invested capital, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 97% of peers. Return on assets: -10.0% vs peer median 3.3%
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 92% of peers. Operating margin: -6.5% vs peer median 6.4%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 92% of peers. Return on invested capital: -7.6% vs peer median 7.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ECX, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ECX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 492 reported | -7.6% | 4.7% | 9% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 518 reported | -6.5% | 4.8% | 9% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 494 reported | -10.0% | 2.1% | 3% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 483 reported | Not reported | 4.9% | — | — | Context only |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 520 reported | 20.9% | 26.6% | 39% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ECX| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9.10T IDR (≈$564M) | 99 | 85 | |
| 1 | 1.5B BRL (≈$267M) | 99 | 92 | |
| 3 | 396M AUD (≈$262M) | 98 | 78 | |
| 3 | 418M USD | 98 | 53 | |
| 5 | 22.1B TWD (≈$685M) | 97 | 65 | |
| 481 | 2.1B CNY (≈$291M) | 5 | 11 | |
| 481 | 2.9B HKD (≈$369M) | 5 | 22 | |
| 481 | 2.1B CNY (≈$290M) | 5 | 9 | |
| 481 | 4.1B CNY (≈$579M) | 5 | 24 | |
| 481 | 350M USD | 5 | 26 | |
| 481 | 195M USD | 5 | ||
| 489 | 3.1B CNY (≈$433M) | 4 | 10 | |
| 489 | 3.1B CNY (≈$430M) | 4 | 27 | |
| 489 | 4.1B CNY (≈$575M) | 4 | 18 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score