Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to ECARX Holdings Inc.
How ECARX Holdings Inc. stacks up
ECX · against 513 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Growth
83/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #65 of 514 · scores higher than 87% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score41 peers with a growth score of 80–89, including ECX · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 83?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Earnings per share growth is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 74% of peers. Revenue growth: 9.9% vs peer median 3.7%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 86% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 18.0% vs peer median 4.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ECX, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ECX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 517 reported | 9.9% | 1.7% | 79% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 316 reported | Not reported | -1.0% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 513 reported | 18.0% | 2.2% | 88% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ECX| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.3B MYR (≈$277M) | 100 | 60 | |
| 2 | 732.9B KRW (≈$528M) | 99 | 61 | |
| 2 | 4.8B CNY (≈$667M) | 99 | 55 | |
| 2 | 3.4B CNY (≈$470M) | 99 | 61 | |
| 2 | 293M USD | 99 | 89 | |
| 65 | 4.6B CNY (≈$642M) | 83 | 82 | |
| 65 | 2.5B CNY (≈$357M) | 83 | 67 | |
| 65 | 428M USD | 83 | 90 | |
| 65 | 414M USD | 83 | 36 | |
| 65 | 350M USD | 83 | 26 | |
| 70 | 71.7B JPY (≈$488M) | 82 | 70 | |
| 70 | 7.45T IDR (≈$462M) | 82 | 71 | |
| 70 | 299M USD | 82 | 82 | |
| 70 | 327M GBP (≈$425M) | 82 | 46 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score