Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
EC · against 44 other Energy companies of similar size
Ranked #37 of 45 · scores higher than 18% of peers · safety percentile 20
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)2 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including EC · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity, which is weaker than most Energy peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | EC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 46 reported | 0.96× | 0.41× | 16% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 45 reported | -0.05 | 0.48 | 86% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 44 reported | 1.51× | 1.34× | 63% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 904.0B TWD (≈$28.0B) | 98 | 63 | |
| 2 | 22.9B USD | 95 | 72 | |
| 3 | 29.1B USD | 95 | 58 | |
| 4 | 286.67T IDR (≈$17.8B) | 93 | 62 | |
| 5 | 2.51T INR (≈$30.2B) | 82 | 76 | |
| 33 | 1.96T INR (≈$23.5B) | 33 | 70 | |
| 34 | 186.0B BRL (≈$33.5B) | 32 | 41 | |
| 35 | 229.8B NOK (≈$21.8B) | 30 | 55 | |
| 36 | 28.7B USD | 25 | 37 | |
| 37 | 34.0B USD | 20 | 37 | |
| 38 | 17.6B USD | 18 | 31 | |
| 39 | 58.3B USD | 15 | 51 | |
| 40 | 58.0B USD | 14 | 48 | |
| 41 | 18.1B USD | 11 | 53 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score