Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Brinker International, Inc.
How Brinker International, Inc. stacks up
EAT · against 204 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Growth
75/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #62 of 205 · scores higher than 68% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score28 peers with a growth score of 70–79, including EAT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 75?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth, 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 68% of peers. Revenue growth: 7.9% vs peer median 3.7%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 77% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 35.4% vs peer median 4.2%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 77% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 12.0% vs peer median 4.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = EAT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | EAT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 205 reported | 7.9% | 5.8% | 60% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 176 reported | 35.4% | 6.5% | 78% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 204 reported | 12.0% | 6.0% | 69% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around EAT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15.2B USD | 99 | 57 | |
| 1 | 9.3B USD | 99 | 43 | |
| 3 | 17.6B SAR (≈$4.8B) | 98 | 68 | |
| 3 | 4.0B EUR (≈$4.4B) | 98 | 41 | |
| 3 | 7.0B USD | 98 | 59 | |
| 60 | 13.8B USD | 76 | 70 | |
| 60 | 232.0B TRY (≈$7.0B) | 76 | 61 | |
| 62 | 5.8B EUR (≈$6.4B) | 75 | 48 | |
| 62 | 15.1B USD | 75 | 54 | |
| 62 | 8.7B USD | 75 | 59 | |
| 62 | 499.1B INR (≈$6.0B) | 75 | 69 | |
| 62 | 5.2B USD | 75 | 54 | |
| 67 | 7.29T KRW (≈$5.2B) | 73 | 65 | |
| 67 | 1.44T JPY (≈$9.8B) | 73 | 78 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score