Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Electronic Arts Inc
How Electronic Arts Inc stacks up
EA · against 21 other Communication Services companies of similar size
Growth
31/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #20 of 22 · scores higher than 10% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score3 peers with a growth score of 30–39, including EA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 31?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Mainly because of its earnings per share growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are weaker than most Communication Services peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 73% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -17.4% vs peer median 8.8%
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 63% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 0.5% vs peer median 3.0%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 0.9% vs peer median 3.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = EA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | EA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 22 reported | 0.9% | 7.3% | 19% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 18 reported | -17.4% | 5.0% | 29% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 22 reported | 0.5% | 5.6% | 10% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around EA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 35.4B USD | 99 | 55 | |
| 2 | 41.2B USD | 98 | 39 | |
| 3 | 82.5B USD | 97 | 70 | |
| 4 | 9.39T JPY (≈$63.9B) | 89 | 78 | |
| 4 | 32.5B USD | 89 | 28 | |
| 16 | 37.7B USD | 45 | 58 | |
| 17 | 41.7B USD | 42 | 37 | |
| 18 | 55.8B AUD (≈$36.8B) | 36 | 48 | |
| 19 | 205.5B SAR (≈$55.5B) | 33 | 61 | |
| 20 | 52.9B USD | 31 | 49 | |
| 21 | 84.0B USD | 25 | 51 | |
| 22 | 39.1B EUR (≈$43.0B) | 16 | 44 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score