Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
E · against 31 other Energy companies of similar size
Ranked #4 of 32 · scores higher than 90% of peers · safety percentile 70
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)3 peers with a safety percentile of 70–79, including E · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its beta, which is stronger than most Energy peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | E | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 32 reported | 0.65× | 0.65× | 52% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 32 reported | 0.24 | 0.55 | 84% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 32 reported | 1.48× | 1.17× | 81% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.14T HKD (≈$146.3B) | 91 | 79 | |
| 2 | 81.4B USD | 79 | 78 | |
| 3 | 60.4B USD | 75 | 77 | |
| 4 | 83.6B USD | 70 | 41 | |
| 5 | 89.1B USD | 67 | 59 | |
| 6 | 42.5B USD | 65 | 56 | |
| 7 | 111.6B USD | 62 | 70 | |
| 8 | 934.4B HKD (≈$119.6B) | 59 | 58 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score