Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc.
How DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. stacks up
DV · against 120 other Communication Services companies of similar size
Valuation
42/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #64 of 121 · scores higher than 47% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score14 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including DV · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 42?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Its metrics sit close to the Communication Services norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 7.2% vs peer median 8.6%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 2.8% vs peer median 2.9%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 7.7% vs peer median 7.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = DV, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | DV | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 121 reported | 2.6% | 2.6% | 49% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 125 reported | 7.2% | 7.2% | 50% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 50 reported | 7.6% | 7.6% | 49% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 122 reported | 52.2% | 49.6% | 53% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around DV| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.5B USD | 99 | 79 | |
| 2 | 1.57T ARS (≈$1.6B) | 96 | 74 | |
| 3 | 1.9B USD | 94 | 79 | |
| 4 | 44.34T IDR (≈$2.7B) | 92 | 58 | |
| 5 | 29.5B ZAR (≈$1.6B) | 91 | 59 | |
| 61 | 615.0B JPY (≈$4.2B) | 43 | 67 | |
| 61 | 2.0B USD | 43 | 65 | |
| 61 | 2.5B USD | 43 | 43 | |
| 64 | 15.2B HKD (≈$1.9B) | 42 | 64 | |
| 64 | 2.1B USD | 42 | 64 | |
| 66 | 17.2B HKD (≈$2.2B) | 41 | 60 | |
| 67 | 2.6B USD | 39 | 34 | |
| 68 | 24.7B CNY (≈$3.5B) | 38 | 43 | |
| 68 | 3.6B NZD (≈$2.1B) | 38 | 53 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score