Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to DT Midstream, Inc.
How DT Midstream, Inc. stacks up
DTM · against 66 other Energy companies of similar size
Growth
81/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #22 of 67 · scores higher than 65% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score16 peers with a growth score of 80–89, including DTM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 81?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth, revenue growth and earnings per share growth, which are stronger than most Energy peers.
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 69% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 24.0% vs peer median 1.1%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 82% of peers. Revenue growth: 18.1% vs peer median 0.5%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 84% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 12.4% vs peer median -1.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = DTM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | DTM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 67 reported | 18.1% | 4.4% | 80% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 60 reported | 24.0% | 9.5% | 58% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 66 reported | 12.4% | 0.9% | 80% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around DTM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 20.8B USD | 98 | 83 | |
| 2 | 15.9B USD | 97 | 59 | |
| 3 | 7.9B USD | 96 | 79 | |
| 3 | 7.0B USD | 96 | 44 | |
| 5 | 7.5B USD | 95 | 68 | |
| 19 | 22.6B CAD (≈$16.5B) | 83 | 66 | |
| 20 | 9.2B USD | 82 | 77 | |
| 20 | 8.4B EUR (≈$9.3B) | 82 | 38 | |
| 22 | 9.94T KRW (≈$7.2B) | 81 | 65 | |
| 22 | 12.5B USD | 81 | 54 | |
| 22 | 22.9B USD | 81 | 72 | |
| 25 | 83.8B CNY (≈$11.7B) | 79 | 52 | |
| 25 | 6.4B USD | 79 | 68 | |
| 27 | 12.6B USD | 78 | 68 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score