Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
DSC · against 212 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #84 of 213 · scores higher than 61% of peers · safety percentile 64
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)14 peers with a safety percentile of 60–69, including DSC · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | DSC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 199 reported | 0.51× | 0.50× | 48% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 207 reported | Not reported | 0.50 | — | — | 33% |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 209 reported | 1.88× | 1.55× | 65% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 607M MYR (≈$134M) | 100 | 77 | |
| 2 | 38.1B JPY (≈$259M) | 99 | 88 | |
| 3 | 30.3B JPY (≈$206M) | 99 | 60 | |
| 4 | 511M SAR (≈$138M) | 99 | 32 | |
| 5 | 2.2B CNY (≈$312M) | 98 | 69 | |
| 80 | 9.5B TRY (≈$284M) | 67 | 18 | |
| 81 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 32.6B JPY (≈$222M) |
| 66 |
| 61 |
| 82 | 9.6B INR (≈$116M) | 65 | 56 |
| 83 | 2.2B CNY (≈$309M) | 65 | 57 |
| 84 | 163M USD | 64 | 26 |
| 85 | 14.6B INR (≈$175M) | 63 | 68 |
| 86 | 259M CHF (≈$298M) | 63 | 48 |
| 87 | 2.5B HKD (≈$319M) | 62 | 82 |
| 88 | 2.3B HKD (≈$296M) | 62 | 59 |