Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Darden Restaurants, Inc.
How Darden Restaurants, Inc. stacks up
DRI · against 102 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
43/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #54 of 103 · scores higher than 45% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score19 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including DRI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 43?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 64% of peers. EBITDA yield: 7.9% vs peer median 8.8%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 4.2% vs peer median 6.1%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 4.8% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = DRI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | DRI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 101 reported | 4.7% | 4.6% | 52% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 104 reported | 6.5% | 7.5% | 37% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 57 reported | 4.4% | 4.8% | 41% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 97 reported | 8.3% | 22.1% | 16% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around DRI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 219.5B CNY (≈$30.7B) | 98 | 66 | |
| 2 | 37.54T KRW (≈$27.0B) | 97 | 65 | |
| 2 | 150.1B HKD (≈$19.2B) | 97 | 79 | |
| 4 | 4.04T JPY (≈$27.5B) | 93 | 76 | |
| 5 | 31.01T KRW (≈$22.3B) | 91 | 59 | |
| 51 | 1.06T INR (≈$12.7B) | 45 | 75 | |
| 51 | 12.2B EUR (≈$13.4B) | 45 | 60 | |
| 51 | 35.5B CAD (≈$25.9B) | 45 | 51 | |
| 54 | 15.1B USD | 43 | 54 | |
| 54 | 24.8B USD | 43 | 54 | |
| 54 | 73.9B BRL (≈$13.3B) | 43 | 58 | |
| 54 | 16.6B USD | 43 | 58 | |
| 58 | 15.0B EUR (≈$16.4B) | 42 | 50 | |
| 59 | 34.0B USD | 40 | 52 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score