Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
DRI · against 102 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #78 of 103 · scores higher than 25% of peers · safety percentile 22
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)17 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including DRI · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its current ratio and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | DRI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 101 reported | 4.15× | 0.78× | 4% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 104 reported | 0.62 | 0.81 | 63% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 97 reported | 0.30× | 1.34× | 1% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 112.0B CNY (≈$15.7B) | 95 | 53 | |
| 2 | 3.98T JPY (≈$27.1B) | 94 | 74 | |
| 3 | 16.1B USD | 93 | 66 | |
| 4 | 5.71T JPY (≈$38.8B) | 93 | 82 | |
| 5 | 24.2B USD | 92 | 66 | |
| 74 | 29.9B USD | 23 | 49 | |
| 75 | 3.33T JPY (≈$22.7B) | 23 | 47 | |
| 76 | 200.3B HKD (≈$25.6B) | 22 | 55 | |
| 77 | 16.8B USD | 22 | 46 | |
| 78 | 24.8B USD | 22 | 54 | |
| 79 | 4.05T INR (≈$48.6B) | 21 | 53 | |
| 80 | 27.4B USD | 21 | 23 | |
| 81 | 16.7B USD | 21 | 54 | |
| 82 | 14.0B USD | 19 | 47 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score