Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Amdocs Limited
How Amdocs Limited stacks up
DOX · against 293 other Technology companies of similar size
Growth
27/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #250 of 294 · scores higher than 14% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score29 peers with a growth score of 20–29, including DOX · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 27?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly because of its revenue growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 88% of peers. Revenue growth: -9.4% vs peer median 8.5%
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 68% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -0.3% vs peer median 4.8%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 19.2% vs peer median 11.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = DOX, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | DOX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 296 reported | -9.4% | 12.0% | 7% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 213 reported | 19.2% | 16.1% | 55% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 291 reported | -0.3% | 8.6% | 19% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around DOX| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 37.0B CNY (≈$5.2B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 4.0B USD | 100 | 84 | |
| 3 | 37.9B CNY (≈$5.3B) | 99 | 58 | |
| 3 | 6.0B USD | 99 | 83 | |
| 3 | 3.8B USD | 99 | 74 | |
| 248 | 4.7B USD | 28 | 19 | |
| 248 | 4.9B USD | 28 | 50 | |
| 250 | 36.8B CNY (≈$5.2B) | 27 | 55 | |
| 250 | 794.8B JPY (≈$5.4B) | 27 | 42 | |
| 250 | 6.5B USD | 27 | 64 | |
| 250 | 12.9B USD | 27 | 53 | |
| 250 | 6.2B USD | 27 | 54 | |
| 255 | 183.7B TWD (≈$5.7B) | 26 | 50 | |
| 255 | 5.6B USD | 26 | 20 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score