Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Healthpeak Properties, Inc.
How Healthpeak Properties, Inc. stacks up
DOC · against 76 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Growth
73/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #24 of 77 · scores higher than 68% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score9 peers with a growth score of 70–79, including DOC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 73?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are stronger than most Real Estate peers.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 5.5% vs peer median 3.0%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 77% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 11.7% vs peer median 3.8%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 78% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 48.7% vs peer median 11.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = DOC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | DOC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 78 reported | 5.5% | 5.4% | 51% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 64 reported | 48.7% | 14.7% | 73% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 76 reported | 11.7% | 6.2% | 73% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around DOC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.1B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 2 | 7.60T CLP (≈$8.4B) | 99 | 86 | |
| 3 | 11.7B USD | 98 | 49 | |
| 3 | 13.7B USD | 98 | 70 | |
| 5 | 7.2B USD | 97 | 34 | |
| 20 | 732.8B INR (≈$8.8B) | 78 | 69 | |
| 21 | 8.6B USD | 76 | 56 | |
| 22 | 1.40T JPY (≈$9.6B) | 75 | 58 | |
| 23 | 14.7B USD | 74 | 61 | |
| 24 | 13.9B USD | 73 | 43 | |
| 24 | 10.8B USD | 73 | 53 | |
| 26 | 17.2B USD | 72 | 67 | |
| 27 | 12.7B USD | 71 | 47 | |
| 27 | 609.8B INR (≈$7.3B) | 71 | 78 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score