Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Krispy Kreme, Inc.
How Krispy Kreme, Inc. stacks up
DNUT · against 284 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Valuation
29/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #187 of 285 · scores higher than 34% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score24 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including DNUT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 29?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Defensive companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -17.3% vs peer median 4.5%
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 70% of peers. EBITDA yield: 7.0% vs peer median 8.7%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 6.6% vs peer median 6.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = DNUT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | DNUT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 278 reported | -17.4% | 4.4% | 5% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 289 reported | 5.7% | 9.0% | 36% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 80 reported | 6.6% | 6.4% | 51% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 279 reported | 109.4% | 64.2% | 82% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around DNUT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 399.1B KRW (≈$287M) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1 | 3.6B MYR (≈$796M) | 100 | 82 | |
| 3 | 87.0B INR (≈$1.0B) | 98 | 76 | |
| 3 | 2.5B BRL (≈$443M) | 98 | 69 | |
| 3 | 8.06T IDR (≈$500M) | 98 | 84 | |
| 182 | 6.6B CNY (≈$928M) | 31 | 36 | |
| 186 | 12.9B TWD (≈$401M) | 30 | 39 | |
| 187 | 4.7B CNY (≈$661M) | 29 | 44 | |
| 187 | 3.0B CNY (≈$418M) | 29 | 45 | |
| 187 | 567M USD | 29 | 16 | |
| 190 | 5.2B HKD (≈$659M) | 28 | 58 | |
| 190 | 7.1B CNY (≈$989M) | 28 | 35 | |
| 192 | 6.9B CNY (≈$968M) | 27 | 31 | |
| 192 | 3.3B CNY (≈$462M) | 27 | 28 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score