Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings, Inc.
How Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings, Inc. stacks up
DNA · against 557 other Healthcare companies listed in US-listed
Profitability
13/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #412 of 558 · scores higher than 24% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score114 peers with a profitability score of 10–19, including DNA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 13?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly because of its return on invested capital and operating margin, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 91% of peers. Return on invested capital: -72.0% vs peer median 4.7%
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 90% of peers. Operating margin: -231.1% vs peer median 7.1%
- Return on assets is close to the peer norm. Return on assets: 2.2% vs peer median 1.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = DNA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | DNA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 517 reported | -72.0% | -7.0% | 18% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 479 reported | -231.1% | -2.4% | 19% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 582 reported | 2.2% | -7.8% | 68% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 531 reported | -59.9% | -19.7% | 23% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 601 reported | 68.0% | 43.9% | 70% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around DNA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 595M USD | 99 | 97 | |
| 1 | 433M USD | 99 | 81 | |
| 1 | 17.9B USD | 99 | 76 | |
| 1 | 52.9B USD | 99 | 57 | |
| 1 | 578M USD | 99 | 73 | |
| 401 | 2.3B USD | 14 | 27 | |
| 412 | 198M USD | 13 | 10 | |
| 412 | 3.7B USD | 13 | 31 | |
| 412 | 968M USD | 13 | 37 | |
| 412 | 725M USD | 13 | 19 | |
| 412 | 1.4B USD | 13 | 38 | |
| 412 | 5.7B USD | 13 | 30 | |
| 412 | 27M USD | 13 | 24 | |
| 412 | 1.4B USD | 13 | 39 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score