Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
DKS · against 151 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #72 of 152 · scores higher than 53% of peers · safety percentile 41
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)13 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including DKS · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | DKS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 148 reported | 1.39× | 0.69× | 27% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 153 reported | 1.10 | 0.92 | 34% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 148 reported | 1.49× | 1.44× | 52% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.75T JPY (≈$11.9B) | 97 | 51 | |
| 2 | 9.5B CHF (≈$10.9B) | 96 | 37 | |
| 3 | 112.0B CNY (≈$15.7B) | 95 | 53 | |
| 4 | 7.8B EUR (≈$8.6B) | 94 | 61 | |
| 5 | 16.1B USD | 93 | 66 | |
| 68 | 232.0B TRY (≈$7.0B) | 43 | 61 | |
| 69 | 12.1B USD | 43 | 57 | |
| 70 | 12.2B USD | 42 | 63 | |
| 71 | 10.5B USD | 42 | 57 | |
| 72 | 13.5B USD | 41 | 62 | |
| 73 | 53.8B HKD (≈$6.9B) | 40 | 67 | |
| 74 | 23.5B USD | 40 | 62 | |
| 75 | 7.2B EUR (≈$7.9B) | 37 | 52 | |
| 76 | 13.9B USD | 37 | 44 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score