Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to HF Sinclair Corporation
How HF Sinclair Corporation stacks up
DINO · against 49 other Energy companies of similar size
Growth
84/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #10 of 50 · scores higher than 80% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score9 peers with a growth score of 80–89, including DINO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 84?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Energy peers.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: -3.7% vs peer median -1.3%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 80% of peers. Revenue growth: 16.3% vs peer median 0.5%
- Earnings per share turned from a loss to a profit. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 1.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = DINO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | DINO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 50 reported | 16.3% | 0.3% | 76% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 47 reported | 238.5% | 13.3% | 93% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 50 reported | -3.7% | -2.7% | 47% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around DINO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 20.8B USD | 98 | 83 | |
| 2 | 15.9B USD | 97 | 59 | |
| 3 | 31.6B USD | 96 | 56 | |
| 4 | 33.9B USD | 91 | 71 | |
| 4 | 20.1B USD | 91 | 65 | |
| 6 | 1.96T INR (≈$23.5B) | 88 | 70 | |
| 6 | 13.0B USD | 88 | 50 | |
| 8 | 12.3B USD | 86 | 66 | |
| 8 | 18.2B USD | 86 | 64 | |
| 10 | 20.2B USD | 84 | 75 | |
| 10 | 113.8B BRL (≈$20.5B) | 84 | 65 | |
| 12 | 22.6B CAD (≈$16.5B) | 83 | 66 | |
| 13 | 12.5B USD | 81 | 54 | |
| 13 | 22.9B USD | 81 | 72 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score