Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
DFPH · against 272 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Ranked #104 of 273 · scores higher than 62% of peers · safety percentile 66
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)31 peers with a safety percentile of 60–69, including DFPH · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Defensive norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | DFPH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 269 reported | 0.11× | 0.42× | 73% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 269 reported | Not reported | 0.30 | — | — | 33% |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 274 reported | 1.51× | 1.62× | 45% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score