Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Dream Finders Homes, Inc.
How Dream Finders Homes, Inc. stacks up
DFH · against 589 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Profitability
43/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #330 of 590 · scores higher than 43% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score67 peers with a profitability score of 40–49, including DFH · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 43?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 66% of peers. Return on invested capital: 3.7% vs peer median 7.3%
- Operating margin is close to the peer norm. Operating margin: 6.2% vs peer median 6.4%
- Return on assets is close to the peer norm. Return on assets: 3.7% vs peer median 3.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = DFH, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | DFH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 564 reported | 3.7% | 7.1% | 35% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 588 reported | 6.2% | 6.4% | 49% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 561 reported | 3.7% | 3.1% | 59% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 551 reported | 9.4% | 7.3% | 60% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 591 reported | 20.0% | 30.2% | 30% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around DFH| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.2B MYR (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 84 | |
| 1 | 9.10T IDR (≈$564M) | 99 | 85 | |
| 3 | 11.2B SEK (≈$1.1B) | 98 | 49 | |
| 4 | 22.1B TWD (≈$685M) | 97 | 65 | |
| 4 | 122.9B JPY (≈$836M) | 97 | 83 | |
| 330 | 90.2B JPY (≈$613M) | 43 | 74 | |
| 330 | 224.7B JPY (≈$1.5B) | 43 | 53 | |
| 330 | 13.1B SEK (≈$1.3B) | 43 | 42 | |
| 330 | 1.3B USD | 43 | 44 | |
| 330 | 914M USD | 43 | 44 | |
| 330 | 3.5B DKK (≈$529M) | 43 | 50 | |
| 340 | 6.8B CNY (≈$948M) | 42 | 40 | |
| 340 | 5.7B CNY (≈$801M) | 42 | 51 | |
| 340 | 5.0B CNY (≈$697M) | 42 | 36 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score