Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Diageo plc
How Diageo plc stacks up
DEO · against 39 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Valuation
11/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #40 of 40 · scores higher than 0% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score8 peers with a valuation score of 10–19, including DEO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 11?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Defensive companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, which is weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 90% of peers. EBITDA yield: 0.6% vs peer median 8.7%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 2.0% vs peer median 4.5%
- Free cash flow yield is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = DEO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | DEO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 40 reported | 3.5% | 4.3% | 41% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 40 reported | 0.6% | 7.4% | 0% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 18 reported | Not reported | 5.3% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 39 reported | 1.2% | 21.1% | 3% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around DEO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 28.1B EUR (≈$30.9B) | 79 | 51 | |
| 2 | 40.7B USD | 75 | 66 | |
| 3 | 22.1B GBP (≈$28.7B) | 71 | 46 | |
| 4 | 70.1B USD | 67 | 47 | |
| 5 | 28.8B USD | 63 | 62 | |
| 36 | 38.2B USD | 18 | 31 | |
| 36 | 29.1B USD | 18 | 28 | |
| 38 | 2.19T INR (≈$26.3B) | 14 | 59 | |
| 38 | 2.41T INR (≈$28.9B) | 14 | ||
| 40 | 52.3B USD | 11 | 25 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score