Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
DECK · against 158 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #29 of 159 · scores higher than 82% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score10 peers with a valuation score of 70–79, including DECK · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its earnings yield, EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
| Metric | DECK | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 157 reported | 8.4% | 5.0% | 83% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 162 reported | 12.8% | 8.6% | 78% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 88 reported | 9.8% | 5.9% | 86% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 158 reported | 20.0% | 32.2% | 32% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.2B USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 51.9B CNY (≈$7.3B) | 98 | 64 | |
| 3 | 150.1B HKD (≈$19.2B) | 97 | 79 | |
| 3 | 7.7B USD | 97 | 68 | |
| 3 | 6.2B USD | 97 | 60 | |
| 24 | 232.0B TRY (≈$7.0B) | 81 | 61 | |
| 26 | 6.5B USD | 80 | 62 | |
| 27 | 114.3B HKD (≈$14.6B) | 77 | 70 | |
| 28 | 2.26T JPY (≈$15.4B) | 76 | 69 | |
| 29 | 11.5B USD | 74 | 78 | |
| 29 | 7.2B EUR (≈$7.9B) | 74 | 52 | |
| 31 | 1.44T JPY (≈$9.8B) | 73 | 78 | |
| 31 | 8.6B USD | 73 | 55 | |
| 33 | 6.7B USD | 70 | 65 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score