Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
DECK · against 161 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #34 of 162 · scores higher than 80% of peers · safety percentile 69
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)18 peers with a safety percentile of 60–69, including DECK · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | DECK | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 159 reported | 0.21× | 0.74× | 79% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 162 reported | 1.12 | 0.90 | 32% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 158 reported | 2.75× | 1.46× | 87% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.75T JPY (≈$11.9B) | 97 | 51 | |
| 2 | 9.5B CHF (≈$10.9B) | 96 | 37 | |
| 3 | 112.0B CNY (≈$15.7B) | 95 | 53 | |
| 4 | 7.8B EUR (≈$8.6B) | 94 | 61 | |
| 5 | 16.1B USD | 93 | 66 | |
| 30 | 1.62T INR (≈$19.4B) | 72 | 65 | |
| 31 | 9.5B USD | 72 | 66 | |
| 32 | 1.46T INR (≈$17.6B) | 72 | 54 | |
| 33 | 52.0B CNY (≈$7.3B) | 70 | 41 | |
| 34 | 11.5B USD | 69 | 78 | |
| 35 | 1.27T JPY (≈$8.7B) | 68 | 63 | |
| 36 | 1.46T JPY (≈$9.9B) | 68 | 62 | |
| 37 | 1.72T JPY (≈$11.7B) | 68 | 51 | |
| 38 | 5.9B USD | 68 | 75 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score