Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Easterly Government Properties, Inc.
How Easterly Government Properties, Inc. stacks up
DEA · against 232 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Valuation
76/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #56 of 233 · scores higher than 76% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score29 peers with a valuation score of 70–79, including DEA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 76?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Real Estate peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 74% of peers. Earnings yield: 1.0% vs peer median 5.3%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 78% of peers. EBITDA yield: 7.6% vs peer median 5.4%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 90% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 24.2% vs peer median 6.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = DEA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | DEA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 250 reported | 0.8% | 5.8% | 26% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 228 reported | 7.6% | 5.6% | 74% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 92 reported | 24.2% | 7.6% | 95% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 252 reported | 122.9% | 113.2% | 57% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around DEA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.0B BRL (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 91 | |
| 2 | 9.23T IDR (≈$572M) | 99 | 88 | |
| 2 | 12.33T IDR (≈$764M) | 99 | 85 | |
| 4 | 139.5B JPY (≈$949M) | 97 | 81 | |
| 4 | 5.8B HKD (≈$737M) | 97 | 86 | |
| 48 | 7.9B SEK (≈$795M) | 78 | 56 | |
| 53 | 3.3B SAR (≈$901M) | 77 | 70 | |
| 53 | 759M USD | 77 | 35 | |
| 53 | 1.2B USD | 77 | 41 | |
| 56 | 1.1B USD | 76 | 43 | |
| 56 | 1.5B EUR (≈$1.6B) | 76 | 74 | |
| 58 | 749M USD | 75 | 74 | |
| 58 | 1.7B EUR (≈$1.9B) | 75 | 72 | |
| 58 | 688M USD | 75 | 65 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score