Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
DDD · against 604 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #455 of 605 · scores higher than 25% of peers · safety percentile 28
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)52 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including DDD · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | DDD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 571 reported | 0.56× | 0.21× | 29% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 586 reported | 2.85 | 0.67 | 1% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 604 reported | 3.40× | 1.92× | 80% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 52.4B JPY (≈$356M) | 100 | 67 | |
| 2 | 2.6B CNY (≈$364M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 3 | 308M USD | 99 | 62 | |
| 4 | 553M EUR (≈$608M) | 99 | 61 | |
| 5 | 2.4B CNY (≈$338M) | 99 | 52 | |
| 451 | 3.8B CNY (≈$528M) | 29 | 54 | |
| 452 | 302M CHF (≈$347M) | 29 | 24 | |
| 453 | 4.6B CNY (≈$642M) | 28 | 34 | |
| 454 | 11.7B TWD (≈$364M) | 28 | 10 | |
| 455 | 454M USD | 28 | 13 | |
| 456 | 4.1B CNY (≈$573M) | 28 | 37 | |
| 457 | 3.7B SEK (≈$367M) | 27 | 47 | |
| 458 | 20.9B TWD (≈$648M) | 27 | 64 | |
| 459 | 25.7B TWD (≈$797M) | 27 | 34 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score