Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
DCOM · against 263 other Banks & Insurance companies of similar size
Ranked #166 of 264 · scores higher than 37% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score28 peers with a profitability score of 30–39, including DCOM · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its return on assets and return on equity, which are weaker than most Banks & Insurance peers.
| Metric | DCOM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 239 reported | Not reported | 10.4% | — | — | Context only |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 40 reported | Not reported | 18.5% | — | — | Context only |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 265 reported | 0.9% | 1.2% | 32% | 50% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 264 reported | 9.6% | 9.9% | 45% | 50% | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 278 reported | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0% | Context only |
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 192.8B JPY (≈$1.3B) | 98 | 47 | |
| 1 | 275.9B INR (≈$3.3B) | 98 | 38 | |
| 1 | 1.8B CHF (≈$2.1B) | 98 | ||
| 1 | 1.3B GBP (≈$1.7B) | 98 | ||
| 1 | 2.5B USD | 98 | 87 | |
| 162 | 1.7B USD | 32 | 48 | |
| 162 | 1.0B USD | 32 | 31 | |
| 166 | 13.5B SAR (≈$3.6B) | 31 | 43 | |
| 166 | 18.3B HKD (≈$2.3B) | 31 | 59 | |
| 166 | 1.8B USD | 31 | 56 | |
| 169 | 2.0B EUR (≈$2.2B) | 30 | 32 | |
| 169 | 1.1B USD | 30 | 55 | |
| 169 | 2.3B USD | 30 | 35 | |
| 172 | 1.13T ARS (≈$1.1B) | 29 | 38 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score