Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Designer Brands Inc.
How Designer Brands Inc. stacks up
DBI · against 355 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
93/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #8 of 356 · scores higher than 97% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score15 peers with a valuation score of 90–100, including DBI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 93?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield, which is stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 22.5% vs peer median 8.8%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 4.9% vs peer median 4.4%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 96% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 33.6% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = DBI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | DBI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 352 reported | 4.6% | 4.3% | 52% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 359 reported | 8.3% | 8.4% | 49% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 325 reported | 36.8% | 5.3% | 99% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 352 reported | 92.6% | 35.8% | 82% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around DBI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.2B USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 7.7B USD | 97 | 68 | |
| 2 | 6.2B USD | 97 | 60 | |
| 4 | 395M USD | 96 | 59 | |
| 4 | 114.1B USD | 96 | 91 | |
| 6 | 439M USD | 95 | 85 | |
| 7 | 92M USD | 94 | 78 | |
| 8 | 1.4B USD | 93 | 65 | |
| 8 | 326M USD | 93 | 54 | |
| 8 | 1.3B USD | 93 | 65 | |
| 11 | 2.9B USD | 92 | 60 | |
| 12 | 4.6B USD | 91 | 56 | |
| 13 | 3.3B USD | 90 | 73 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score