Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated
How Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated stacks up
DBD · against 478 other Technology companies listed in US-listed
Growth
77/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #175 of 479 · scores higher than 62% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score70 peers with a growth score of 70–79, including DBD · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 77?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth, which is stronger than most Technology peers.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 5.4% vs peer median 8.5%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 2.8% vs peer median 4.8%
- Earnings per share turned from a loss to a profit. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 11.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = DBD, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | DBD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 496 reported | 5.4% | 13.1% | 25% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 286 reported | Not reported | 22.4% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 471 reported | 2.8% | 9.7% | 31% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around DBD| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 40.5B USD | 100 | 75 | |
| 1 | 28.4B USD | 100 | 79 | |
| 1 | 4.0B USD | 100 | 84 | |
| 1 | 965.7B USD | 100 | 84 | |
| 1 | 1.4B USD | 100 | 72 | |
| 167 | 10.6B USD | 78 | 68 | |
| 175 | 3.5B USD | 77 | 35 | |
| 175 | 4.8B USD | 77 | 56 | |
| 175 | 3.4B USD | 77 | 24 | |
| 175 | 1.9B USD | 77 | 59 | |
| 175 | 1.4B USD | 77 | 42 | |
| 175 | 46.8B USD | 77 | 62 | |
| 175 | 8.3B USD | 77 | 71 | |
| 175 | 9.1B USD | 77 | 87 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score