Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to DoorDash, Inc.
How DoorDash, Inc. stacks up
DASH · against 37 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Growth
94/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #5 of 38 · scores higher than 86% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score6 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including DASH · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 94?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its revenue growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 7.4% vs peer median 4.2%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 93% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 27.4% vs peer median 4.3%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 95% of peers. Revenue growth: 33.6% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = DASH, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | DASH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 38 reported | 33.6% | 8.3% | 86% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 33 reported | 7.4% | 5.2% | 63% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 38 reported | 27.4% | 9.6% | 86% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around DASH| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 79.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 1 | 47.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 3 | 73.8B EUR (≈$81.2B) | 98 | 58 | |
| 4 | 4.05T INR (≈$48.6B) | 97 | 53 | |
| 5 | 79.4B USD | 94 | 46 | |
| 5 | 84.3B USD | 94 | 53 | |
| 7 | 458.9B HKD (≈$58.7B) | 82 | 53 | |
| 7 | 114.1B USD | 82 | 91 | |
| 7 | 2.15T MXN (≈$116.3B) | 82 | 87 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score