Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Danaos Corporation
How Danaos Corporation stacks up
DAC · against 605 other Industrials companies of similar size
Growth
41/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #389 of 606 · scores higher than 34% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score78 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including DAC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 41?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 61% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 1.6% vs peer median 4.2%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 2.7% vs peer median 7.1%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 2.8% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = DAC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | DAC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 610 reported | 2.8% | 6.0% | 36% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 508 reported | 1.8% | 7.6% | 42% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 600 reported | 1.6% | 5.5% | 32% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around DAC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 74.1B TWD (≈$2.3B) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 22.5B NOK (≈$2.1B) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1 | 2.5B USD | 100 | 70 | |
| 1 | 5.2B USD | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 4.6B USD | 100 | 58 | |
| 389 | 20.6B CNY (≈$2.9B) | 41 | 25 | |
| 389 | 14.6B HKD (≈$1.9B) | 41 | 49 | |
| 389 | 382.7B JPY (≈$2.6B) | 41 | 28 | |
| 389 | 319.2B INR (≈$3.8B) | 41 | 61 | |
| 389 | 2.8B USD | 41 | 81 | |
| 389 | 4.5B USD | 41 | 58 | |
| 389 | 1.5B EUR (≈$1.6B) | 41 | 63 | |
| 389 | 2.2B GBP (≈$2.8B) | 41 | 59 | |
| 389 | 23.6B SEK (≈$2.4B) | 41 | 61 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score