Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Caesars Entertainment, Inc.
How Caesars Entertainment, Inc. stacks up
CZR · against 265 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Growth
40/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #195 of 266 · scores higher than 26% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score33 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including CZR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 40?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 2.0% vs peer median 4.3%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 2.1% vs peer median 3.7%
- Earnings per share growth is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CZR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CZR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 266 reported | 2.1% | 5.6% | 31% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 235 reported | Not reported | 6.7% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 264 reported | 2.0% | 5.9% | 26% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CZR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.1B USD | 100 | 59 | |
| 2 | 27.1B CNY (≈$3.8B) | 99 | 35 | |
| 2 | 272.3B INR (≈$3.3B) | 99 | 61 | |
| 2 | 9.3B USD | 99 | 43 | |
| 5 | 17.6B SAR (≈$4.8B) | 98 | 68 | |
| 190 | 1.72T JPY (≈$11.7B) | 41 | 51 | |
| 190 | 4.6B USD | 41 | 44 | |
| 190 | 5.1B USD | 41 | 59 | |
| 195 | 21.7B CNY (≈$3.0B) | 40 | 35 | |
| 195 | 5.9B USD | 40 | 39 | |
| 195 | 5.6B USD | 40 | 47 | |
| 195 | 4.4B USD | 40 | 53 | |
| 199 | 9.5B USD | 39 | 66 | |
| 200 | 70.6B CNY (≈$9.9B) | 38 | 52 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score