Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CXW · against 473 other Industrials companies listed in US-listed
Ranked #238 of 474 · scores higher than 50% of peers · safety percentile 34
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)61 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including CXW · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CXW | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 451 reported | 0.95× | 0.63× | 34% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 430 reported | 0.57 | 1.12 | 86% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 473 reported | 1.32× | 1.79× | 29% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 157M USD | 100 | 35 | |
| 1 | 1.4B USD | 100 | 38 | |
| 1 | 209M USD | 100 | 46 | |
| 4 | 402M USD | 100 | 39 | |
| 5 | 4.5B USD | 100 | 33 | |
| 234 | 8.3B USD | 35 | 54 | |
| 235 | 1.8B USD | 35 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 77 |
| 236 | 10.1B USD | 35 | 62 |
| 237 | 1.1B USD | 35 | 64 |
| 238 | 3.1B USD | 34 | 56 |
| 239 | 774M USD | 34 | 69 |
| 240 | 814M USD | 34 | 26 |
| 241 | 6.4B USD | 33 | 17 |
| 242 | 3.2B USD | 33 | 22 |