Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CXM · against 496 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #214 of 497 · scores higher than 56% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score65 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including CXM · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger free cash flow yield, but weaker earnings yield than most Technology peers.
| Metric | CXM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 491 reported | 1.3% | 2.4% | 37% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 502 reported | 4.5% | 4.6% | 49% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 174 reported | 7.1% | 3.4% | 77% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 493 reported | 32.7% | 33.5% | 48% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.1B USD | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 1.7B USD | 100 | 67 | |
| 3 | 16.7B HKD (≈$2.1B) | 98 | 80 | |
| 3 | 69.0B TWD (≈$2.1B) | 98 | 65 | |
| 3 | 32.0B TWD (≈$990M) | 98 | 68 | |
| 214 | 19.6B CNY (≈$2.7B) | 56 | 50 | |
| 214 | 1.9B SGD (≈$1.4B) | 56 | 61 | |
| 214 | 58.3B TWD (≈$1.8B) | 56 | 48 | |
| 214 | 1.1B USD | 56 | 38 | |
| 214 | 1.6B USD | 56 | 48 | |
| 214 | 693M CHF (≈$797M) | 56 | 39 | |
| 214 | 841M EUR (≈$925M) | 56 | 45 | |
| 214 | 1.6B USD | 56 | 44 | |
| 222 | 8.4B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 55 | 40 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score